An AI agent is a system that autonomously takes actions to achieve goals. Unlike a chatbot that responds to one message at a time, an agent runs a loop – observing its environment, reasoning about the next step, acting, and repeating until the task is complete. This guide covers building agents from minimal loops to production-grade systems.
Every agent follows the same fundamental cycle:
The loop terminates when the agent determines the goal is met or a maximum step limit is reached.
This differs from a chatbot in a critical way: the agent decides autonomously how many steps to take and which tools to use, rather than responding to each user message independently. 1)
ReAct (Reason + Act) is the most widely used agent pattern. It structures the LLM's output into explicit reasoning traces interleaved with actions:
Thought: I need to find the current stock price for AAPL.
Action: search_web({"query": "AAPL stock price today"})
Observation: AAPL is trading at $198.50.
Thought: I now have the price. I can answer the user.
Action: respond({"message": "AAPL is currently trading at $198.50."})
The explicit Thought step improves transparency and helps the model make better tool-selection decisions. 2)
A basic agent needs three components: an LLM, a set of tools, and a loop.
Each tool is a function with a JSON Schema description:
tools = [
{
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "search_web",
"description": "Search the web for current information",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"query": {"type": "string", "description": "Search query"}
},
"required": ["query"]
}
}
}
]
def agent(user_query, tools, max_steps=10):
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": user_query}]
for step in range(max_steps):
response = llm.chat(messages=messages, tools=tools)
if response.tool_calls:
for call in response.tool_calls:
result = execute_tool(call.name, call.arguments)
messages.append({"role": "tool", "content": result, "tool_call_id": call.id})
else:
return response.content # Final answer
return "Max steps reached"
This is the complete minimal agent. The LLM decides whether to call a tool or return a final answer on each iteration.
The messages array acts as short-term memory within a single task. For long-running agents, summarize older messages to stay within context limits:
if count_tokens(messages) > MAX_TOKENS:
summary = llm.summarize(messages[:-5]) # Keep recent 5
messages = [{"role": "system", "content": summary}] + messages[-5:]
For agents that need to remember across sessions, use a vector database:
This gives the agent a growing knowledge base that improves over time. 3)
| Framework | Best For | Architecture | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|
| LangGraph | Complex stateful workflows | Graph of nodes and edges | High (full control) |
| CrewAI | Multi-agent teams | Role-based agents with task delegation | Medium |
| AutoGen | Conversational multi-agent | Message-passing between agents | Medium |
| Smolagents | Lightweight single agents | Minimal dependencies, fast prototyping | Low |
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, END
graph = StateGraph(AgentState)
graph.add_node("reason", reasoning_node)
graph.add_node("act", tool_execution_node)
graph.add_edge("act", "reason")
graph.add_conditional_edges(
"reason",
should_continue,
{"continue": "act", "done": END}
)
agent = graph.compile()
LangGraph provides explicit control over the execution flow, including conditional branching, parallel execution, and human-in-the-loop checkpoints. 4)
Decompose a complex goal into sub-tasks before executing:
plan = llm("Break this goal into 5 sequential steps: {goal}")
for step in plan:
result = agent_loop(step, tools)
The agent critiques its own output and iterates:
draft = agent_loop(task, tools)
critique = llm(f"Review this output for errors: {draft}")
if needs_improvement(critique):
final = agent_loop(f"Improve based on feedback: {critique}", tools)
Specialized agents collaborate under an orchestrator:
CrewAI and AutoGen provide built-in patterns for multi-agent collaboration. 5)
Test agents rigorously before deployment:
Build a test suite of 100+ representative tasks. Use an evaluator LLM to score outputs automatically, supplemented by human review for edge cases. 6)