Table of Contents

Multi-Agent Systems

Multi-agent systems (MAS) organize multiple specialized AI agents — typically powered by large language models — to collaborate on complex tasks through structured coordination patterns. By 2025, multi-agent architectures have become the dominant approach for building sophisticated AI applications, outperforming single-agent systems in parallel processing, adaptability, and collective reasoning.

Orchestrator Patterns

Supervisor (Central Orchestrator)

A primary agent acts as a hub, decomposing tasks, routing them to specialized workers, and synthesizing results. This hub-and-spoke model ensures consistency and simple debugging, but can bottleneck at 10-20 agents due to coordination overhead and context concentration.

Variants include the Single Agent + Dynamic Routing pattern, where the primary agent invokes specialists via dynamic function calling based on the current task.

Peer-to-Peer

Agents collaborate directly without a central authority, enabling flexible local optimizations like negotiation. For example, driver agents might share route information in a delivery system. Peer-to-peer supports emergent behaviors but risks inconsistency without oversight.

Hierarchical

A multi-level structure with supervisor agents at the top, domain agents in the middle, and specialists at the bottom. Combines parallel execution, feedback loops, and shared tools/RAG for knowledge access. The control flow follows: decompose, execute parallel subtasks, gather feedback/refine, aggregate results.

Pattern Strengths Weaknesses Best For
Supervisor Guaranteed consistency, simple debugging Orchestrator bottleneck, sequential latency Task routing, research pipelines
Peer-to-Peer Tactical flexibility, high throughput Potential inconsistency Local optimizations, negotiations
Hierarchical Scalable, parallel processing Complex state management Multi-domain problems, content creation
Hybrid Strategic + tactical balance Implementation complexity Enterprise workflows

Debate and Voting

Agents can engage in debate by proposing solutions, critiquing peers, and iterating via feedback loops. A voting mechanism selects the best output from multiple candidates. This pattern improves reasoning through diverse perspectives and is often implemented as:

The Mixture of Agents approach uses diverse specialist agents to achieve collective intelligence that exceeds any individual agent's capability.

Agent Specialization

Role-specialized agents (researcher, writer, coder, reviewer) leverage domain expertise while using smaller, more efficient models. Key enablers include:

Code Example

# Supervisor pattern using LangGraph
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, END
from typing import TypedDict, Literal
 
class TeamState(TypedDict):
    task: str
    research: str
    code: str
    review: str
    status: str
 
def supervisor(state: TeamState) -> TeamState:
    """Supervisor decomposes task and routes to specialists."""
    if not state.get('research'):
        return {**state, 'status': 'needs_research'}
    elif not state.get('code'):
        return {**state, 'status': 'needs_coding'}
    elif not state.get('review'):
        return {**state, 'status': 'needs_review'}
    return {**state, 'status': 'complete'}
 
def researcher(state: TeamState) -> TeamState:
    result = llm.invoke(f"Research: {state['task']}")
    return {**state, 'research': result}
 
def coder(state: TeamState) -> TeamState:
    result = llm.invoke(f"Code solution based on: {state['research']}")
    return {**state, 'code': result}
 
def reviewer(state: TeamState) -> TeamState:
    result = llm.invoke(f"Review code: {state['code']}")
    return {**state, 'review': result}
 
def route(state: TeamState) -> Literal['researcher', 'coder', 'reviewer', '__end__']:
    status = state['status']
    if status == 'needs_research': return 'researcher'
    if status == 'needs_coding': return 'coder'
    if status == 'needs_review': return 'reviewer'
    return '__end__'
 
graph = StateGraph(TeamState)
graph.add_node('supervisor', supervisor)
graph.add_node('researcher', researcher)
graph.add_node('coder', coder)
graph.add_node('reviewer', reviewer)
graph.set_entry_point('supervisor')
graph.add_conditional_edges('supervisor', route)
for node in ['researcher', 'coder', 'reviewer']:
    graph.add_edge(node, 'supervisor')
app = graph.compile()

Frameworks Implementing MAS

Design Principles

References

See Also